It would be nice if they would read what the rest of the social sciences are up to at the very least. I get the sense they will ignore the literature folks and religious studies and art history folks etc. but they could check in w/ their larger area.
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
Yeah I'd have no leg to stand on if it weren't for CRT, and it's often strange to see people pay lip service to it without understanding its history and context, to say nothing of current scholarship. I like to think folks are getting better about much of this, though...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RachelSchine @dorothyk98
...perhaps I'm being overly optimistic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RachelSchine
I still get the “but they didn’t say race then” question. I am like, they also did not say Medieval, Middle Ages, gender, class etc. and your point?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @RachelSchine
We should just do handouts and say other questions than this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @RachelSchine @dorothyk98
I'd also love a mug that just says "having black hagiographies doesn't make you anti-racist" in giant letters, for every time I give a talk and someone says "but have you heard of Bilal? or Antarah?"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RachelSchine
Omg. This. For me I am like, if the virgin martyr is Black at the end that means it is full Dolzealean transracialism and there is some wth white woman racist stuff going on.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
I'd love that.