The terms of this debate are so confused, when they're not being willfully misconstrued. This op-ed about the Katz piece is not, in fact, a defense of free speech. The WSJ op-ed page is the one "policing speech." 1/6https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-speech-police-at-princeton-11594769170 …
-
-
All the alt-right folks on campuses have used tactics that include doxxing students, continuous terrorized stalking, etc. so exactly how does Princeton deal when a faculty member incites stochastic violence on students. They are not safe in this "learning" environment.
-
I was addressing whether what he did counts as incitement according to the SCOTUS decision. It’s not clear to me that it does. I consider student safety a separate issue from that point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.