The terms of this debate are so confused, when they're not being willfully misconstrued. This op-ed about the Katz piece is not, in fact, a defense of free speech. The WSJ op-ed page is the one "policing speech." 1/6https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-speech-police-at-princeton-11594769170 …
-
-
More the question is what is Princeton's rules in regards to the incitement of violence towards students. They are not safe & b/c of where he published his piece, they are potential targets of stochastic violencehttps://www.wired.com/story/jargon-watch-rising-danger-stochastic-terrorism/ …
-
This is what has always frustrated me in public discussions of my own stuff. The issue was never about free speech or academic freedom, it was about violence and specifically racialized violence. Discussing free speech or academic freedom is a fascist trap & deflection.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.