#RaceB4Race A thread on division & specialization of academic intellectual labor (filters are intact): Let's stop reinforcing whyte hegemonic notions of academic disciplines when it comes to premodern race. (I write this as Margo Hendricks/EM Eng lit)
1/
-
-
A critical gender research group doing recent work have ppl speak that basically are speaking about gender in a 1950s bubble? This would never get onto a panel at the National Women’s Studies Association. So consider that rubric & do we have medieval historians being accepted 3/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To AAIHS or critical ethnic studies conference... that is the standard. So yes send your scholars who do critical race but they have to be conversant in the discussions of critical race now. This by the way theoretically means we are in the material turn (biopolitics etc.).
-
Also for RaceB4Race we believe in centering BIPOC scholars. So are they BIPOC scholars. This cuts the numbers down dramatically. History’s training (unlike religious studies-so beside lit.,) has been hostile to up to date methodology in social sciences.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.