#RaceB4Race A thread on division & specialization of academic intellectual labor (filters are intact): Let's stop reinforcing whyte hegemonic notions of academic disciplines when it comes to premodern race. (I write this as Margo Hendricks/EM Eng lit)
1/
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Elysabethgrace
I have been very struck by the absence of historians (esp. early modern) in RaceB4Race, but I read that as a history problem. It matters only insofar as disciplinary training gives us different tools, and different questions which are useful & challenging.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @susandamussen
I agree, & with other disciplines. Long story made brief, when a colleague & I organized UCHRI residential group (then titled pre-and early modern studies) on race in 1996, w/ the exception of Ray Kea very little interest among historians.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Elysabethgrace @susandamussen
Even Women, Race & Writing was a difficult sell. Also, for those of us lit folk working w/race premodern, we extensively use "historians" tools to frame our historical/cultural/societal context. I think the "discipline issue" shld be a non-starter w/race.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Last time in September we had Michael Gomez and Marissa Fuentes. They do not work on Europe but the work on critical race.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Also no one that I know in premodern critical race and musicology. I know just a handful of premodern critical race who are BIPOC scholars in art history.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Also, religious studies probably has more folks doing critical race and premodern though also folks who are BIPOC is hard to find. This is the thing, do folks fit these two criteria? If they do not.....
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.