I am so sorry. I will also say as someone who edits different things in relation to critically new areas of discussion, I have noticed a particularly sharp increase in critique and I would call backlash in relation to the premodern critical race studies work I have moved thru 1/
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98 @MiraAssafK
editing, more than any other kind of critical cluster of work (Early Middle English, transgender studies, anything I do in DH) I have done. This is not about you or your work. This is @ editors at journals/collections & the peer review that is deeply ill-equipped & hostile 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @MiraAssafK
to work that address premodern critical race studies. It is a major issue that we all need to discuss at
#RaceB4Race but I have seen first hand as an editor. 3/1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @MiraAssafK
This is the reaction that our special issue in teaching race in the premodern received from one reviewer, who decided that it was to political and wrong and therefore should not be published.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @dorothyk98 @MiraAssafK
It’s being published and one of our contributors even discusses this I his paper. But this is what we’re dealing with: active and virulent hostility and gatekeeping that keeps the field “pure.”
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98 @MiraAssafK
Proud of our editor and the journal for their commitment.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.