#MedievalTwitter still read the entire thread. @kirstenCarella did apologize, but only after I asked her if she was planning to apologize. So this is what is deeply confusing and makes it very difficult for me and other members of the MOC the organization to feel in any way 4/
-
-
#MedievalTwitter actually then address this publicly or privately? You say you want to support & work on issues identified by MOC, LGBTQIA, & scholars who have called out sexual predators in ISXX, a number of these have done years of work w/ nothing changing b/c obstruction 15/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter yet, you continue to undermine us by saying 1 thing, professing that you want to work w/us, but then pretty much saying the opposite in public tweets. How exactly can any of us who have asked for these changes & have seen nothing imagine that we can trust you 16/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter some of us who have interacted on these issues w/ you are not tenured, ECRs, independent scholars. However, this does not seem to stop you from punching down, rather than addressing the critiques. This also does not seem to be a good sign for your ISXX work 17/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter so far as ED, you have reached out to make white folks, particularly those who said racist terrible, comfortable. Yet, no work, rather instead subtweets & the use of one oppression to deflect from issues related to other oppressions, to MOCs, LGBTQIA, etc. 18/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter You say you want to work w/ folks asking for equity & justice (MOCs, LGBTQIA, sexual harassment activists) yet you seem unwilling to own that U did actually say that fake-news tweet to me. But you like people telling Erik (an ECR) that's not what it meant 19/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter so let's be clear, you meant that tweet, I thought you apologized, but if you can't own that you said that, then I feel your apology was not in good faith. So why should we trust you b/c so far, you have demonstrated in multiple instances why we should not 20/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter finally, I don't know what you want to do but if you believe in intersectionality, then how is it that ISXX as a white org is going to be inclusive now? So it's fine now b/c they are maybe LGBTQIA inclusive because they appointed you, when at the moment, 21/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter there may be 1-2 LGBTQIA+MOC person working on early England? They are gone. How exactly is making an org more white somehow solidarity in relation to all the issues, especially racism, that was discussed in relation to ISXX? 22/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter also, please stop saying MRO etc. does not speak for all MOCs. MRO has done the most work in relation to ISXX, it's disrespectful of all the labor not to mention the abuse she had to deal with (the racial slurs, the constant "are you the help", antiblackness, 23/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter violent threats etc.) The Medievalists of Color is an organization, it's an activist & political org., they have already written their letter in support of leaving. Scholars of color are not the same as MOC. Stop tokening scholars of color as well as shields 24/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter Here is what a number of us expect, the ISXX org will just use this Exec. Dir. as a shield to continue white supremacist back-to-status quo procedure & do nothing. I expect a bunch of white women will run for the board & diversity will be about white women 25/Show this thread -
#MedievalTwitter and finally, I expect ISXX will try to use any minority scholars as shield, particularly ones they feel are the "good" & "acceptable" ones. This is respectability politics par excellence. MOC is not interested in violent respectability politics. END.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.