To clarify, dear #MedievalTwitter, please do the emotional labor to deal w/ this woman's white fragility 101. Since apparently, she will not stop bothering MOCs.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @dramdarcy
It's not the scholarly society twitter feed anymore. So, what is your point? As for the "whiteness"--white fragility 101 You are textbook p. 57 in that peer reviewed article.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @dramdarcy
who exhibits and does precisely what is discussed on p. 57, point by point. Apparently the basic tenets of antiracism are beyond you. Actual self-reflection about your whiteness. You did say you wanted to read research, well there is research.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @dramdarcy
And if I remember correctly from Facebook OE group, you supported the Cambridge "golden boys" who decided it was perfectly polite to send poison pen letters internationally. because I explained structural racism to them.
#MeToo
& toxic masculinity & all that.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @dramdarcy
To say there is structural racism, to point out whiteness 101 and white fragility is not bullying. But apparently you are perfectly unwilling to read any peer-reviewed research. So apparently white male moderator blocking my posts for @SocMedFem was not racist or bullying?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
When I am posting announcements from the scholarly society as well as fellowships, statements, and CFPs. Hmmm. Apparently, that is just so beyond the pale, actually posting as the communications person for the society the materials the society is sending around.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.