It's also delightful that you all can be at MAA. Some of us can't. We don't know if fascists will be stalking us.
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98 @prplmnkydw and
Also, please realize, your comment about our "historical" research is a hallmark of postracialism. Feel free to read Sumi Cho's article. it's one of the hallmarks. Its a form of moral equivalence, the call for "rigor" b/c to talk about race is somehow not "real research."
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @prplmnkydw and
It's racist as Cho explains quite eloquently in her legal scholarship. If you have actually read the entire
#RaceB4Race thread, it is not the antiracist, intersectional, critical premodern race we are interested in.1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @homophonous and
That sounds good, I would hope this stuff would be activist and anti racist. I really don’t know who will sign up for the AARHMS panels, but hopefully some good critical and antiracist scholars. Also note AARHMS isn’t sponsoring MAA sessions here. Leeds and Kzoo.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @prplmnkydw @homophonous and
There are 9-12 speakers at each
#RaceB4Race. There is no registration fee so ppl can come. No one in this thread who is asking why white iberianists are not centered has come to#RaceB4Race.So how is a critique of the predominately BIWOC organizing this series & finding resources1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @prplmnkydw and
To have this kind of meeting to center the work and convos of BIPOC more of the issue that critiquing the white supremacy of all those medieval conferences you named that is 99% white? Do you have BIPOC caucus or org? Are you giving them resources to have &
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @prplmnkydw and
Lead this convo? So if this is a complaint about white medievalists not being the center about critical premodern race then you are not interested in what we are doing. Nor have you engaged in any of this conversation F2F or online.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @homophonous and
No, truly I haven’t. Totally not my field, I’m only interested in it to learn. I only weighed in to promote the panels organized by my fellow AARHMS people
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @prplmnkydw @homophonous and
As the 300+ ppl who have shown up in the two so far have ranged in periods to contemporary and also geographies and areas, that seems not to have stopped ppl from coming.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @homophonous and
That’s great turnout. What are the plans for future conferences?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
There are 8 more. ASU every year until 2023 in Jan. And then it travels around 1x a year. Brandeis in 2020 w/ classics. 2021 at Rutgers where Nick is on our list b/c topic but will not get notified until full funding and admin. Things are squared away. 2022 & 2023 are organizing.
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98 @homophonous and
Well it sounds like this is where the conversation should be happening. I will recommend to the scholars I know trying to work on these topics. And I will aim to attend.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.