See I thought *everyone* knew about it... IMC 2017 was a public scandal. I also assumed the committee would have been open about why they needed to address the problems, particularly to their new members!
-
-
Replying to @skatemaxwell @DollyJorgensen and
(By which I mean: they should have told you!)
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @skatemaxwell @dorothyk98 and
Please be reassured that the Congress is working very hard to be a safe space for all scholars and wants to encourage participation from underrepresented groups. That’s all I can say on this topic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DollyJorgensen @skatemaxwell and
I highly doubt this since they have done nothing to communicate that they have addressed serious security issues. Saying we welcome diversity does none of the work that shows that is happening. So I really do not see anything to indicate that the conference is safe.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @skatemaxwell and
You are of course free to disregard what I’ve said. Or you could take it seriously as confirmation that positive things are happening which you do not see. It’s clear that you’re bitter about your experience (understandable but unfortunate) so perhaps nothing will change that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DollyJorgensen @skatemaxwell and
This is basically a form of victim-blaming.
@IMC_Leeds has not communicated or shown anything that indicates to me personally or anyone else broadly that they have done anything to address these issues. So where is the evidence?1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @DollyJorgensen and
People have written research about this. It's called when you name a problem, you are the problem.
@SaraNAhmed has written about it in her books & here: https://feministkilljoys.com/2014/02/17/the-problem-of-perception/ …2 replies 3 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @DollyJorgensen and
What this shows me from your comment is that you have decided that the safety & security of vulnerable scholars, is not something you or your organizers are willing to substantially tackle w/out defaulting to classic
#RapeCulture#MeToo
& Diversity as whiteness tactics.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @DollyJorgensen and
As what happened at
#IMC2018 meant I received violent threats against my life including rape threats, deciding that it's "my bitterness" when I have seen no evidence other than you saying, not the director or the organizing committee, that somehow things are happening is1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @DollyJorgensen and
classic victim-blaming, it's "my fault" for expecting actual safety & security, let alone organizers who communicate clearly. No.
@SaraNAhmed wrote an entire book about this: https://www.dukeupress.edu/on-being-included …1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
You can educate yourself and read. And if this is how the members of the organizing committee plan to deal with this, then it further shows that #IMC2019 and all IMCs in the future are not safe for any marginal scholar. Statements do nothing and clearly you have now decided the
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98 @DollyJorgensen and
way to go is to victim blame me for basically going to fulfill my professional duties, in which I paid the conference to attend, to give talks and moderate sessions, but somehow that should put me in further violent danger and it's "my fault."
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @DollyJorgensen and
If this is the tactic that
@IMC_Leeds plans to take in order to address their safety, security, and inclusion problems. Then basically, they are continuing to support white supremacy, rape culture. What your comment shows me is that it's clear they do not even plan to have the1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.