Though much of the press has been focused on @KzooICMS , they have responded and also sent emails to ask for feedback to address things. #IMC2019 @IMC_Leeds has officially never responded.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @dorothyk98, @EarlyModernista ja
I brought it up at a roundtable this morning;
@DollyJorgensen said it was being addressed, but the actual incident itself was not mentioned afaik. And it should be! Horrified you never received an apology, never mind a response, Dorothy.1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @skatemaxwell, @dorothyk98 ja
I should just clarify here that what I said in the round table was that ensuring diversity at the conference was brought up in the committee meeting and everyone agreed that this needs to be targeted. There was no mention of a specific incident. Just FYI.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @DollyJorgensen, @dorothyk98 ja
I referred to it, though not directly (I think). It was certainly what drove me to put up my hand!
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @skatemaxwell, @dorothyk98 ja
Your question asked about intersectionality and what the panelists thought about their own positions. I had no idea that there was a specific context or history behind the question (although you may have had one).
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @DollyJorgensen, @dorothyk98 ja
See I thought *everyone* knew about it... IMC 2017 was a public scandal. I also assumed the committee would have been open about why they needed to address the problems, particularly to their new members!
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @skatemaxwell, @DollyJorgensen ja
(By which I mean: they should have told you!)
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @skatemaxwell, @dorothyk98 ja
Please be reassured that the Congress is working very hard to be a safe space for all scholars and wants to encourage participation from underrepresented groups. That’s all I can say on this topic.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @DollyJorgensen, @skatemaxwell ja
I highly doubt this since they have done nothing to communicate that they have addressed serious security issues. Saying we welcome diversity does none of the work that shows that is happening. So I really do not see anything to indicate that the conference is safe.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @dorothyk98, @skatemaxwell ja
You are of course free to disregard what I’ve said. Or you could take it seriously as confirmation that positive things are happening which you do not see. It’s clear that you’re bitter about your experience (understandable but unfortunate) so perhaps nothing will change that.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
This is basically a form of victim-blaming. @IMC_Leeds has not communicated or shown anything that indicates to me personally or anyone else broadly that they have done anything to address these issues. So where is the evidence?
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @dorothyk98, @DollyJorgensen ja
People have written research about this. It's called when you name a problem, you are the problem.
@SaraNAhmed has written about it in her books & here: https://feministkilljoys.com/2014/02/17/the-problem-of-perception/ …2 vastausta 3 uudelleentwiittausta 18 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @dorothyk98, @DollyJorgensen ja
What this shows me from your comment is that you have decided that the safety & security of vulnerable scholars, is not something you or your organizers are willing to substantially tackle w/out defaulting to classic
#RapeCulture#MeToo
& Diversity as whiteness tactics.1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.