That's very clear, thank you for taking the trouble to explain!
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98 @DorsetGirl1 and2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
-
Replying to @dorothyk98 @DorsetGirl1 and
We are in wave 4ish of feminism, it means it is not a single-axis issue. It includes issues around race, sexuality, class, disability etc. And thus white supremacist heteropatriarchy is a thing and upholds and compounds it all.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @HeidiBrave and
Thank you for taking the time to reply, but while you may be in "wave 4ish" of feminism, I'm just an old-fashioned non-academic who finds all this very confusing because what I mean by feminism is simply that women should be treated equally fairly to men by society and the law.
3 replies 0 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @DorsetGirl1 @HeidiBrave and
Actually feminism is that all people should be treated equitably.
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @HeidiBrave and
Could you explain how that is different from what I said?
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @DorsetGirl1 @HeidiBrave and
Everyone, not just cisgendered, white women, should have equitable access and be treated equitably.
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That's why I used the possibly woolly term "equally fairly"- because it's too late at night for me to be digesting differences between concepts like equity and equality. I was hoping
@dorothyk98 wd explain why she had used "equitable" and by implication rejected "equally fairly".1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I used equitable because I was probably thinking about Twitter character counts. But equity is discussed quite regularly.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I said equitable and equity. They are versions of the same word. One as a noun. One as an adjective.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.