You understand how intellectual thought works right? And that it's not brainwashing. And that sometimes people read things, and they think that they're wrong, and that used to be a normal part of academic discourse till you fascists took over?
-
-
Replying to @janeclarejones
As the fascists have me as their target, it's really fascinating how being inclusive, supporting transgender folks, discussing intersectional feminism is somehow "fascist." As I actually write about the far right and fascism, I find this name calling interesting.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @janeclarejones
So then, what is your point, if you've written all these things, and are happy to identify as anti-trans, against intersectionality, but basically for essentialist white feminist ideas of sex, what exactly are you trying to defend? You are a TERF.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
SHE'S A WITCH BURN HER BURN HER. Yup, not a totalitarian bone in your body. Seriously. Go a read the French critique of identitarianism and get the fuck back to me.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
Is there a particular reason that somehow you feel necessary to use expletives when apparently you wish to have "intellectual discourse." Also, as I said earlier, I never brought up witches, but sure, go ahead and continue with the rhetoric (a rhetoric the far right also likes).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
If you don't understand the historical form of your own discourse that ain't my problem. And I swear because I want to, and because I'm an old crone who gives absolutely no fucking fucks. You've never met hags have you? Pity. We're a BALL.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
And again, what is the point. If you own it, why are you angry for being called out for your anti-trans stance, belief in trans conspiracy theories, and anti-intersectionality? You are not interested in equity or inclusion, so why even say feminist?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
Own what. Being a witch??? You really don't understand shit about feminist history do you??? Witches are women who are free of the need to win patriarchal approval. And you are on the side that likes to burn us. That's it.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
Actually, as I have actually done research on both medieval witches and the early modern witch trials, this is really a question of why do you even want to go there. But the point is, I never called you a witch, your decided on saying that I called you a witch.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
Jesus, for a bunch of people who misuse the word literal all the time you really are SO FUCKING LITERAL.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
You seem to really have a thing for the term witch. It's a deflection. Why argue if it's quite clear that you want to be an anti-trans, conspiracy-pedaling, TERF.
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
It's not a deflection. You are targeting strong powerful non-compliant middle aged women who don't give a fuck about male approval. You are calling them a name that marks them out for social opprobrium and is designed to control other women by example. You're a witchfinder.
0 replies 2 retweets 7 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.