And so if you are anti-trans, no, you are not a "feminist." unless you are using a definition that ignored 40 years of critical discussion.
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
So, let me recap the questions I have asked you and that you have not answered: Please explain: 1. How male people are female. 2. How white people invented male and female people. 3. How patriarchy came into existence if male and female people were only invented in the 15 C.
2 replies 7 retweets 41 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
As you have declared, after some back and forth since you seemed unwilling to answer that question, that you back this letter, and that you back the "evidence" (conspiracy theories) in the letter, what is the point of these questions. #1 is 2nd-wave feminism. #2 was 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
"Male people are female because is second-wave feminism." That's your answer. Ooookay.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
Did we ignore the entire discussion of gender vs. sex and also gender queer not to mention gender fluid, obviously you have ignored transgender theory.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
The thing is, you can keep telling me I have ignored things, and I will keep telling you that I have read them, and that I have written thousands of thousands of words on why I think they're crap.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones @dorothyk98
You understand how intellectual thought works right? And that it's not brainwashing. And that sometimes people read things, and they think that they're wrong, and that used to be a normal part of academic discourse till you fascists took over?
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
As the fascists have me as their target, it's really fascinating how being inclusive, supporting transgender folks, discussing intersectional feminism is somehow "fascist." As I actually write about the far right and fascism, I find this name calling interesting.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
So, are we allowed to not believe in gender identity and think mammals are sexually dimorphic in peace now then? Because if so, cool, the war is over. REJOICE!
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones @dorothyk98
Ps - Are you going to answer the questions?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
I did answer your questions. I don't see the point in basically pulling up research since3 you pretty much refuse to do anything with it. You are a TERF & seem happy to stand by your anti-trans, against intersectionality, sex is gender stance. You are a TERF and transmisogynist.
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
So, you're not going to answer my questions. You're just going to call me names. Good work.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones @dorothyk98
Instructive exchange though. Bunch of word salad interspersed with telling a woman she’s too emotional and tsk-tsking at swearing. Also, “name calling is wrong you fascist!”.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.