1. Guilt by association. So Jennifer Pritzker is a Trump supporter and a major NRA donor, but weirdly, that is not why I think trans ideology is a load of incoherent neoliberal techno-Platonist death worshipping crapola.
-
-
Replying to @janeclarejones
You are still not answering the question about do you support this letter, do you support the conspiracy theories it propagates. Also, as someone who keeps having Nigel Farage avatars liking your comments, what is your point other than you are anti-trans.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @janeclarejones
And so if you are anti-trans, no, you are not a "feminist." unless you are using a definition that ignored 40 years of critical discussion.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
So, let me recap the questions I have asked you and that you have not answered: Please explain: 1. How male people are female. 2. How white people invented male and female people. 3. How patriarchy came into existence if male and female people were only invented in the 15 C.
2 replies 7 retweets 41 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
As you have declared, after some back and forth since you seemed unwilling to answer that question, that you back this letter, and that you back the "evidence" (conspiracy theories) in the letter, what is the point of these questions. #1 is 2nd-wave feminism. #2 was 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
"Male people are female because is second-wave feminism." That's your answer. Ooookay.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
Did we ignore the entire discussion of gender vs. sex and also gender queer not to mention gender fluid, obviously you have ignored transgender theory.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
The thing is, you can keep telling me I have ignored things, and I will keep telling you that I have read them, and that I have written thousands of thousands of words on why I think they're crap.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones @dorothyk98
You understand how intellectual thought works right? And that it's not brainwashing. And that sometimes people read things, and they think that they're wrong, and that used to be a normal part of academic discourse till you fascists took over?
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
As the fascists have me as their target, it's really fascinating how being inclusive, supporting transgender folks, discussing intersectional feminism is somehow "fascist." As I actually write about the far right and fascism, I find this name calling interesting.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
So then, what is your point, if you've written all these things, and are happy to identify as anti-trans, against intersectionality, but basically for essentialist white feminist ideas of sex, what exactly are you trying to defend? You are a TERF.
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
SHE'S A WITCH BURN HER BURN HER. Yup, not a totalitarian bone in your body. Seriously. Go a read the French critique of identitarianism and get the fuck back to me.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones @dorothyk98
And let me spell out my point. You are committed to a metaphysical anti-realist belief system which is trying to erase female people as a political and legal class. You will not allow anyone to not believe your metaphysical belief system and are committed to demonising and
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.