And can you explain to me as someone who has a Ph.D. in feminist philosophy what exactly does being anti-trans somehow show that your feminist philosophy Ph.D. has done a good job training you in these questions?
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
After you've explained to me how white people invented the sexual dimorphism of mammals sure.
2 replies 1 retweet 62 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones @dorothyk98
Or rather, because until 5 years ago when this anti-realist totalitarian bullshit took over the whole academy thinking that female people were oppressed by male people using a system called gender was a perfectly respectable part of left-wing academic thought. That's how.
1 reply 1 retweet 54 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
So apparently now we are blaming who for what? If you back the Times letter you are anti-trans and basing it on trans panic violent conspiracy theories. So exactly how do you explain your support of that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
So basically all you've got is word-salad and calling me a witch. Well, that makes you absolutely par for the course. Are you going to answer my questions? Or are they not phrased with enough rhetorical froufrou bullshit for your tastes?
2 replies 1 retweet 51 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
As I never said "witch" but actually asked, if you are backing the Times letter (which you appear to be doing since you are backing all the people who are fighting for the Times letter piece) and that propogates trans conspiracy theories, you seem unable to answer my question.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
You never said 'witch'???? And you're the one taking the high ground about who understand irony. You're hilarious.
1 reply 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
You said I said that, I did not. What is your point. So, let's be clear, you do back the Times letter, you back the anti-trans stance. So that's pretty much what I thought. So exactly why are you arguing with me since you have now identified as anti-trans.?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
And you don't understand why I keep mentioning witch-burning


ARE YOU ONE OF THOSE BAD EVIL WOMEN? IF YOU ADMIT TO BEING A BAD EVIL WOMAN THEN I WILL KNOW YOU ARE BAD AND EVIL.
Cool argument.1 reply 2 retweets 34 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
As I never brought up witches, but apparently you and other TERFs wish to imagine yourselves as being the victims, I see that there is some investment in this rhetorical strategy. As you have admitted to being anti-trans and now people are critiquing you, what is the problem?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Isn't this the point of academic freedom, being able to critique with evidence-based work. Or is conspiracy theories something you are perfectly happy to support?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.