Patriarchy is a system of male dominance for the purpose of male people appropriating and controlling female people's reproductive labour. What do you think it is seeing as you think male and female people were invented by white people when they colonised the Americas?https://twitter.com/dorothyk98/status/1143246467718504448 …
-
-
Replying to @janeclarejones
I take it you've never read about white supremacist heteropatriarchy. Are we still down to essentialist 1-issue things? Also reproductive rights is also about transgender rights.https://everydayfeminism.com/2018/10/6-tips-for-making-your-conversations-about-reproductive-rights-more-trans-inclusive/ …
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
I have a PhD in feminist philosophy lady, I suggest you don't condescend to me because I think Tumblrised intersectional BS is a rigorous as a fucking soufflé. Are you going to explain how male people are female, and what the fuck that has to do with white supremacy really?
2 replies 11 retweets 110 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
And can you explain to me as someone who has a Ph.D. in feminist philosophy what exactly does being anti-trans somehow show that your feminist philosophy Ph.D. has done a good job training you in these questions?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
After you've explained to me how white people invented the sexual dimorphism of mammals sure.
2 replies 1 retweet 62 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones @dorothyk98
Or rather, because until 5 years ago when this anti-realist totalitarian bullshit took over the whole academy thinking that female people were oppressed by male people using a system called gender was a perfectly respectable part of left-wing academic thought. That's how.
1 reply 1 retweet 54 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
So apparently now we are blaming who for what? If you back the Times letter you are anti-trans and basing it on trans panic violent conspiracy theories. So exactly how do you explain your support of that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
So basically all you've got is word-salad and calling me a witch. Well, that makes you absolutely par for the course. Are you going to answer my questions? Or are they not phrased with enough rhetorical froufrou bullshit for your tastes?
2 replies 1 retweet 51 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
As I never said "witch" but actually asked, if you are backing the Times letter (which you appear to be doing since you are backing all the people who are fighting for the Times letter piece) and that propogates trans conspiracy theories, you seem unable to answer my question.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
What is rhetorically about asking, 1. do you support the Times letter? 2. Do you support the trans conspiracy promulgated in that Times letter? So if so, explain how this is not transmisogyny or in any way "feminist."
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
Please explain how believing Stonewall is a trans rights lobbying organisation that has been involved in providing training in universities is a conspiracy?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @janeclarejones @dorothyk98
Please also explain why thinking that male people who identify as women have a right to redefine the concept of women against the consent of female people is feminism.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.