Thanks. Those of us not in literature don't know this lingo. (And we historians don't call History Compass, "HiCo.") Here's link for those looking: https://www.academia.edu/28913418/Early_Globalities_Global_Literatures_Introducing_a_Special_Issue_on_the_Global_Middle_Ages ….
Is this the intro. or your piece? I am talking about the intro. Though again, the idea that the intro. writers were being ironic and that excuses them, I do not think that is a legitimate defense.
-
-
The intro. There is one short ironic passage which I think some people have misread. But I’m not going to get into a debate about the intro because, as I said, I don’t think it represents my work or my perspective.
-
The entire intro. was littered w/ problems. I tweeted all the passages & comments that were problematic when it came out in one very long twitter thread. So no, it wasn't the one paragraph. And I still do not think a defense of "irony" holds water. But yes, you did not write it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.