Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
dorothyk98's profile
Dr. Dorothy Kim
Dr. Dorothy Kim
Dr. Dorothy Kim
@dorothyk98

Tweets

Dr. Dorothy Kim

@dorothyk98

Medievalist, digital humanist, intersectional feminist. She/her/hers.

Joined April 2012

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Monica H Green, PhD‏ @monicaMedHist 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @dorothyk98 @cameronmcnabb and

      Thanks. Those of us not in literature don't know this lingo. (And we historians don't call History Compass, "HiCo.") Here's link for those looking: https://www.academia.edu/28913418/Early_Globalities_Global_Literatures_Introducing_a_Special_Issue_on_the_Global_Middle_Ages ….

      1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes
    2. Caroline Dodds Pennock‏ @carolinepennock 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @monicaMedHist @dorothyk98 and

      Hi all. Some fascinating links in this thread! Personally, coming back to the original q, I think that ‘medieval’ CAN be colonising if used uncritically, but sometimes we need to (critically and consciously) use commonly understood terms to try and have ‘global’ discussions. 1/

      2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
    3. Caroline Dodds Pennock‏ @carolinepennock 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @carolinepennock @monicaMedHist and

      Try as I might, I just don’t seem to be able to bring in ‘Classic & post-Classic’ as a global framework ;-) Amanda Power & I conceded ‘medieval’ in this piece to allow comparison & instead focused on trying to decentre ‘globalisation’: https://academic.oup.com/past/article/238/suppl_13/88/5230774 … (free access). 2/2

      1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes
    4. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @carolinepennock @monicaMedHist and

      As I was quite clear when I tweeted my specific full critique of this introduction, where exactly is global MA anything but a continuation of the white gaze? How can you discuss bottom-up methodology with no discussion of under commons, maroon histories, decolonization, poco etc?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Caroline Dodds Pennock‏ @carolinepennock 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @dorothyk98 @monicaMedHist and

      I didn’t write that introduction. Perhaps you’d do me the courtesy of reading my actual contribution before commenting?

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    6. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @carolinepennock @monicaMedHist and

      Fair point. The introduction creates a cloud for the entire special issue.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    7. Caroline Dodds Pennock‏ @carolinepennock 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @dorothyk98 @monicaMedHist and

      There’s certainly a discussion to be had there (tho I think some passages were written in an intended ironic tone which perhaps didn’t translate well to a US ear) but I hope you’d find Amanda & I took a very different approach 1/2

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    8. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @carolinepennock @monicaMedHist and

      I don't think it was about ironic tone. IT was straight uphold white supremacist frames and completely ignore and erase a lot of the critical scholarship done by non-white scholars. To then decide the defense is "irony" is straight out of postracialism 101.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @dorothyk98 @carolinepennock and

      This is #4 in Sumi Cho's article on postracialism, the "US" is too sensitive excuse and the racism is an American invention and it's not happening in Europe excuse. So no, they wrote it, there is no irony & there is no excuse for it.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Caroline Dodds Pennock‏ @carolinepennock 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @dorothyk98 @monicaMedHist and

      There was a short passage which I believe was intended ironically/sarcastically. You haven’t even asked which one before jumping to dismiss me. But wd I have written the intro differently? Yes. That’s why I said: take the time to read my own work before throwing around judgments.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 25 Apr 2019
      Replying to @carolinepennock @monicaMedHist and

      Is this the intro. or your piece? I am talking about the intro. Though again, the idea that the intro. writers were being ironic and that excuses them, I do not think that is a legitimate defense.

      9:51 AM - 25 Apr 2019
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Caroline Dodds Pennock‏ @carolinepennock 25 Apr 2019
          Replying to @dorothyk98 @monicaMedHist and

          The intro. There is one short ironic passage which I think some people have misread. But I’m not going to get into a debate about the intro because, as I said, I don’t think it represents my work or my perspective.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 25 Apr 2019
          Replying to @carolinepennock @monicaMedHist and

          The entire intro. was littered w/ problems. I tweeted all the passages & comments that were problematic when it came out in one very long twitter thread. So no, it wasn't the one paragraph. And I still do not think a defense of "irony" holds water. But yes, you did not write it.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info