Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
dorothyk98's profile
Dr. Dorothy Kim
Dr. Dorothy Kim
Dr. Dorothy Kim
@dorothyk98

Tweets

Dr. Dorothy Kim

@dorothyk98

Medievalist, digital humanist, intersectional feminist. She/her/hers.

Joined April 2012

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Simon Trafford‏ @SimonJPTrafford 9 Apr 2019

      To judge from recent comments, it seems to be the case that at least some members of English departments in the US believe that discussion of 'race' in medieval studies began in the 2010s. This is a little surprising. In archaeology and history departments in Europe... 1/n

      3 replies 19 retweets 67 likes
      Show this thread
    2. David Álvarez J.‏ @alvarezjimenezd 9 Apr 2019
      Replying to @SimonJPTrafford

      Race or identity?

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    3. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 9 Apr 2019
      Replying to @alvarezjimenezd @SimonJPTrafford

      Actually, the way that medieval historians and archaeologists have discussed "race" basically has defined it as if they ignored a century of historiography in social sciences on the term and especially the last 50 years. So no, medieval historians and archaeologists did 1/2

      1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
    4. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 9 Apr 2019
      Replying to @dorothyk98 @alvarezjimenezd @SimonJPTrafford

      not discuss "race" before 2010 in the way that actually attends to the definition that is not a white supremacist, pre-Civil Rights definition. If you wish to read more about that, you can wait for the AHR article that they have asked me for that I expect will be out in 2020.

      3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
    5. Simon Trafford‏ @SimonJPTrafford 10 Apr 2019
      Replying to @dorothyk98 @alvarezjimenezd

      Great, if you are engaging with it there, then I look forward to reading about it. (Sorry, it's hard to make that statement not sound sarcastic, but please believe me that it is not intended to be so). Discussion of race in medieval studies has taken a really interesting...

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    6. Simon Trafford‏ @SimonJPTrafford 10 Apr 2019
      Replying to @SimonJPTrafford @dorothyk98 @alvarezjimenezd

      ...turn in the last few years, I'm happy to agree, and the more that those -such as yourself- who have promoted those interesting conversations engage with existing scholarship on the subject the better. )...

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    7. Simon Trafford‏ @SimonJPTrafford 10 Apr 2019
      Replying to @SimonJPTrafford @dorothyk98 @alvarezjimenezd

      I would re-iterate my point, though, that we understand vastly more about race in the Middle Ages now than we did fifty years ago as a result of the scholarship that I was talking about, despite your reservations about it, and that it is important to recognise that.

      1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
    8. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 10 Apr 2019
      Replying to @SimonJPTrafford @alvarezjimenezd

      50 year ago the definition of "race" was grounded in social science white supremacist pre-Civil Rights methodology. If the scholarship has stuck to this definition, what exactly did we learn? Other than scholars are happy to ignore 50 years of social science scholarship.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 10 Apr 2019
      Replying to @dorothyk98 @SimonJPTrafford @alvarezjimenezd

      If the discussion basically rehashes debates that social science scholarship left long behind, how is that somehow learning more "about race" rather than keeping the status quo. That status quo meant also white supremacist methodologies. If you are nuancing that, how is that new?

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 10 Apr 2019
      Replying to @dorothyk98 @SimonJPTrafford @alvarezjimenezd

      For example, if you said the same thing about gender, but 50 years ago, people were using the term sex, and we were exactly stuck in those frames of cisgendered, heteronormative, binary, how is that learning a lot since 50 years ago? You just nuanced binary, hetero cis "sex"

      10:26 AM - 10 Apr 2019
      • 1 Like
      • Dr. Carla María Thomas
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        1. Dr. Dorothy Kim‏ @dorothyk98 10 Apr 2019
          Replying to @dorothyk98 @SimonJPTrafford @alvarezjimenezd

          and thus nothing LGBTQIA, nothing past wave 1 of feminism, nothing gender, nothing transgender etc. are in those discussions. So this makes no logical sense to me. And I expect no logical sense for the rest of the social sciences if a field freezes the def. in the 60s.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info