To judge from recent comments, it seems to be the case that at least some members of English departments in the US believe that discussion of 'race' in medieval studies began in the 2010s. This is a little surprising. In archaeology and history departments in Europe... 1/n
-
-
if not potentially the late 19th-early 20th c. is not a good look.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not a good look indeed. About hegemony and Heng, beautiful point. I think one take is that there is really good work but that it moves in a parallel world that doesn’t necessarily need Heng because her concerns are different. I have a hard time fully agreeing with that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in other news: an observation from earlier today: not much Iberia going on at the next installment of raceb4race. I can think of several ways to read that, but it’s an interesting thing to note.
-
But that is about firmly centering BIPOC scholars. And also it is about the Folger and the topic. You do realize the first one was about those who got shut out at Kzoo & then extending that convo to Early Modern. There are 8 more
#RaceB4Race things planned for the next 4 years. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.