I don't see, where it is scientifc to use literature by the "right mix" of researchers instead of the best literature. This can not be the right way. It has to be the best, not the most political correct.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @MarcusCyron @SarahEBond
What does “best” mean in this context? Honest question.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ericdaryl @SarahEBond
How should I know. Always depend in the toppic. But nearly every subject has it's own standard and teaching literature.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
So interesting that you want to discuss standards in subjects but refuse to actually address the standard critical definitions of: race, racism, inclusivity, politically correct. How is this "best" methodologically? Or just more woefully inadequate logical argumentation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Cool - you wanna discuss this on Twitter. Wow - you are really a scientist? OO
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I find it quite telling that now you have pulled the show me your credentials move. That really does speak to your clear issues around non-white scholars. But clearly still do not want to do any research. Or read.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
But if you are a "scientist" apparently you have ignored large swathes of conversation in STEM that has discussed decolonization, inclusivity, and the epistemological issues of the scientific method. Look here's more reading from an astrophysicist: https://medium.com/@chanda/decolonising-science-reading-list-339fb773d51f …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.