I don't see, where it is scientifc to use literature by the "right mix" of researchers instead of the best literature. This can not be the right way. It has to be the best, not the most political correct.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @MarcusCyron @SarahEBond
What does “best” mean in this context? Honest question.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ericdaryl @SarahEBond
How should I know. Always depend in the toppic. But nearly every subject has it's own standard and teaching literature.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
So interesting that you want to discuss standards in subjects but refuse to actually address the standard critical definitions of: race, racism, inclusivity, politically correct. How is this "best" methodologically? Or just more woefully inadequate logical argumentation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Cool - you wanna discuss this on Twitter. Wow - you are really a scientist? OO
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
And this is your idea of how logical scientific method discussions work? No actual reading, no research, no logical discussion of critical scholarship or definitions, but a "show me your credentials." So have you asked everyone else who has responded to you the same question?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.