I don't see, where it is scientifc to use literature by the "right mix" of researchers instead of the best literature. This can not be the right way. It has to be the best, not the most political correct.
So interesting that you want to discuss standards in subjects but refuse to actually address the standard critical definitions of: race, racism, inclusivity, politically correct. How is this "best" methodologically? Or just more woefully inadequate logical argumentation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.