I don't see, where it is scientifc to use literature by the "right mix" of researchers instead of the best literature. This can not be the right way. It has to be the best, not the most political correct.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @MarcusCyron @SarahEBond
Often women's or POCs' work is the best. And where works of comparable importance are written by white males and scholars of underrepresented groups (as it is usually in scholarship since the 1960s), I assign the author of the underrepresented group. Always. It's even not hard.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Did we literally decide to define structural racism w/ no actual reference to the critical scholarship on what structural racism means. Also, reverse racism is a myth. I love how "meritocracy" includes white men making arguments w/out reference to actual critical definitions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @MarcusCyron and
Wouldn't we all, since we are discussing syllabi, fail our students essays and written exams for making this methodological mistake. Not defining terms that aren't pulled from their heads. What happened to "best" practices of critical definitions, research, and citation?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
So for all the #AcademicWhiteness that wants to discuss "race" "racism" etc., be a scholar and do some actual reading and research and come back to discuss when you have appropriately defined the term in its critical discussion now. Otherwise, your best is woefully unrigorous.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.