If they do publish something, there is no assurance it was not altered by the third party (Russia), so they're just part of Putin's team.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe hit up the
@thedailybeast They seem to know how to peddle stuff.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is new category of war correspondent now. You all know the Russians and others are going to try to muddy the waters. Thoughtfully choosing your coverage and ledes may determine whether we live in a Democracy or under the thumb of a Dictator.
#WordsMatterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Washington Post's
@nakashimae decided to republish this claim, knowing that the company making it chose to exclude it from their report. You have your answer.pic.twitter.com/dicN9RIiPL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it's accurate and it's in the public interest to know, you have an obligation to publish it, regardless of where it came from.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probably, not any different than with the tripe they put on, now...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They'll do what they've always done. They'll report the info once or twice with a disclaimer & 12 hours later, it'll be picked-up by other outlets who will conveniently omit the disclaimer. Bullshit is better for business.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was just thinking that! I'm just a voter from Michigan but this really really matters to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.