4 Dom, he was absent on 3rd reading.
-
-
Replying to @jut1972 @Colchesterviews
Nope. "5 votes for".pic.twitter.com/Q6bxaWHrhX
4 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @jut1972 @domcgraham
I don't care about his voting record, his tone in that interview is all wrong. We all know why he couldn't answer the direct question.
2 replies . 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Colchesterviews @jut1972
That's an extraordinary statement. MPs should be judged on their voting record. Everything else is just noise.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @domcgraham @jut1972
I agree Dom, his answers to that Journo was precisely that, noise. I think you'd do rather well to step away from this.
1 reply . 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Colchesterviews @jut1972
Any criticism of Lib Dems on LGBT+ issues simply nonsense. Actions, not words.https://lgbt.libdems.org.uk/en/page/always-been-there-for-you-and-we-always-will …
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @domcgraham @jut1972
watch the interview, you should be embarrassed, I was for you.
1 reply . 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Colchesterviews @jut1972
My free tip for the day: Always best to pay more attention to what politicians actually do (ie. how they vote) rather than what they say.
3 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @domcgraham @jut1972
So basically they all lie to summarise?
1 reply . 0 retweets 2 likes
No. It's not truth or lie. Conversations are much more nuanced than that. Your interpretation of a statement will be different to mine.
-
But voting is clear. No room for misinterpretation. No wiggle room. And voting leads to action.
0 replies . 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.