So apparently even I have given her too much credence. She is actually a Naturopathic “Doctor.” I didn’t look at her hashtags closely enough.
Certainly explains the grift aspect all the more, but now I’m far less confident about any meaningful conversation with her.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A pediatrician criticizing doctors who "cave in" to an organization that has been overseeing safe vaccination in children for decades should be immediately suspect of secondary gain.
-
also “…immediately susp-“ ended
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"vaccine-neutral"? What does that mean exactly?
-
Subtitled “I’m just gonna present evidence and you can decide!” In reality, she goes against evidence and guidelines for vaccine timelines and necessity (for all vaccines, not even talking about COVID). Feeding into disinformation and conspiracies and then selling folks stuff.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Frightening that your friend could not figure that out.
-
More a reflection of how cunning these grifters are, I think. They make it sound legit and with that degree behind it…it lends an unmerited credence. Which makes it all the more devious.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
) pediatrician whose other posts talk about other docs “caving in to the AAP” on vaccinations.
The very next post was the doc selling supplements and I went “Ahh, there it is.” 