And then the fact that he calls himself "Chief Engineer" of Tesla while the actual "Chief Engineer" of Tesla has some stupid title like "Chief Operational Engineer" and his PR flacks harass any journo who calls the Chief Engineer "Chief Engineer."
-
-
-
I mean that's some pretty big "Pay no attention to the little man behind the curtain" energy.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@jbaert toch wel echt een eikel die elon.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you share documentation on this founding of Tesla story? I feel like I’m frequently confronting the PR residue in people’s minds wrt Mister Musk and this story would seem to scrub the noxious air pretty clean
-
Literally the first sentence of the Wikipedia entry for Tesla.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
To those curious this seems to be an objective account of what happened https://www.wired.com/2009/06/eberhard/ … Elon appears to be less genuine than what I first thought
-
I'm wondering how genuine you thought he was in the first place considering his family history.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I believed it was a well known fact that he invested in Tesla then developped it.
-
You believed Wrong! Every one assume his genius founded both Spacex & Tesla. Hence the Genius-Savior personal brand & all the passes that came with it
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well. That’s a new wrinkle in my deep distaste for this guy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.