

“How many software packages that are central to science were made as a result of grants? I hope (and imagine) the answer is not zero, but I am not familiar with any examples.”https://twitter.com/amuellerml/status/1214600063672049665 …
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Callout to
#rstats here: "[none of] numpy, matplotlib, pandas, scipy, scikit-learn, scikit-image … were started by grants. From my conversations with people in the R community, my understanding was that the situation there is similar...1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
If you are aware of central pieces of open source infrastructure that were kick-started by a grant, please let me know, as I’m quite curious to see their development."
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
As someone who applies for NIH grants to fund new R packages (most of which do not get funded), I can say with high confidence I would be laughed out of study section if I proposed (critical) maintenance of any existing package that is widely used by NIH researchers.
1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
I actively avoid developing public R packages because I don't think I could get funding to continue maintaining them after they're built. It's a bad situation
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.