Seattle landmarks program seems mostly to be failing. A labor temple is turning into a club for corporate tycoons and we're worried about brick color? If you destroy the function, the form seems of little consequence.
I guess the dream of the landmarks program is that future Seattleites will be able to point to preserved facades in otherwise shattered buildings and vaguely make out the history. To me the in-between option feels pretty hollow, though.
This approach would spare us the indignity of unionbusting business execs schmoozing in remodeled luxury where once steel workers, janitors, fast food workers, etc gathered to exercise their basic workers rights in unassuming halls. They get no preservation points from me.
Plus, our landmarks policy probably cost the unions selling the property millions by burdening the site with costly preservation costs. They may have preferred the cash to a sad reminder. Not a great system.
Iβm not a tenant so I wouldnβt presume to speak for them but my guess is that it was mostly a pain in the butt that impacted the sale price negatively. History is great but Iβm sure most unions would rather have the $ to spend on organizing workers.