oh, i have no investment in that position and don't think it's the case, but Conway here doesn't refute it either, in the whole thing free will is just a black box hypothetical causal phenomenon whose provenance isn't raised as a question
OP claims that interpretation is /not/ orthogonal that it is compatible only with Many Worlds.
-
-
oh, i see the difficulty. you're just talking about different things. Conway's assertion that free will of collections of particles implies free will of particles holds under any QM interpretation. pomo is saying free will itself can only come from many-worlds
-
it's like if one person is saying "liquids conform to the shape of any container that holds them" and another is saying "liquids can only be poured into cylinders". the truth of these things looks related but isn't
-
Yes you do need a trivial third observation: "there exist non-cylindrical containers"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.