The only way free will can work is if the Many worlds therom of quantum mechanics is true, and each conscious derision results in a new universe. And quantum mechanics means that most of these decisions are being made by particles, with life forms being pretentious bundles.
I will (freely) suggest to both of you to read up on Conway's Strong Free Will Theorem.
-
-
well, the Wikipedia article is confusing. the intro summarizes what sounds like a reduction to absurdity of the concept of free will, demonstrating that if it exists, then there must be elementary particles that have it
-
Well, if we stop chauvinistically assuming that the "Observer" of quantum mechanics must be a human, then the logical conclusion is that a particle is "observed" whenever it interacts with another particle, and that free will is an inherent property to all matter.
-
What we perceive as choices are simply the consensus of an uncountable number of sub atomic particles which chose which way to bounce when they interact with each other.
-
Have you considered emergent theory? I.e. particles aren't conscious but big collections of them can be
-
The problem is when exactly you draw the line. We still haven't defined consciousness in a useful way. The Animist solution is that there is no dividing line, and that particles or rocks or animals are just different degrees of conscious.
-
Emergence actually does have measurable thresholds, though. Consider surface tension of liquids, freezing/boiling points, etc
-
I do agree there's prolly a spectrum of consciousness but it's completely possible there are seemingly arbitrary cutoff points
-
Emergence would also imply that multiple routes could lead to consciousness via convergent evolution.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.