Aristotle, the ancient philosopher who classifies my kind of person as wholly inferior to his own? That guy? Yeah...I'm not convinced by him
-
-
Replying to @revmagdalen @Rick_RIB4EVER
And this has what, exactly, to do with his metaphysics? John Locke gave Newton shitty monetary policy advice, I guess liberalism is refuted
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TAJackson20 @Rick_RIB4EVER
As a female conscious being, his mistake about my kind of person shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the entire matter.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rick_RIB4EVER @TAJackson20
There is nothing I could "learn" from someone who believes they are talking to some sort of animal when they talk to me. They are deluded.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
To return to the topic at hand, Aristotle was wholly ignorant of biology, the science of how things like beings form and grow and evolve.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
If he had known what we know now, he would have realized any hypothetical first being would have to be female.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The male form developed later, as a method for beings to reproduce by combining genetic lines. It accelerated evolution exponentially.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
An incomplete reading. Protists combine sperm (virus, plasmid) and egg (membrane) in single organism, hence, hermaphrodite
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djinnius
SPERMS FOR THE SPERM GOD! BLOCKED FALLOPIAN TUBES FOR THE BLOCKED FALLOPIAN TUBE PRESIDENT
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.