Not sure what you intend. Guess: ‶We can't know if institutional structures are sexist until we determine sexism measure.″ Is that it?
-
-
Replying to @least_nathan
If cultural, institutional structures can be changed. Sexism exists. Therefore, sexist institutional structures can be changed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djinnius @least_nathan
This is obviously not true of, say, boxing. It is obviously true of, say, a men's club. Where does Google fall?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @djinnius @least_nathan
We can certainly change boxing and men's clubs, for example by banning them; but maybe you mean that boxing is sexist by nature?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kragen @least_nathan
I mean that male-only boxing is 99% genetic, and e.g. male-only Freemasonry 100% cultural.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djinnius @least_nathan
I think I was watching a women's boxing match last week?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kragen @least_nathan
Was the term 'male-only boxing' unclear in some way?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @kragen @least_nathan
Cool let me catch you up: there is a sport called men's boxing where you have to be a man to do it.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I never liked the gender, species, or cyborg restrictions on sports. Probably why I never got into them much.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I am in favor of an open division and a bio-femme division, which is fair and pleases no one. This is wearying and usual.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.