Sexist institutional structures exist which we can change. Why does it matter if populations differ due to genes vs culture?
-
-
I never liked the gender, species, or cyborg restrictions on sports. Probably why I never got into them much.
-
Joking aside: much I don't understand here; I want to publicly affirm I support & advocate inclusiveness esp. for marginalized populations.
-
I want our culture able to question things + have inclusive convo without alienating already marginalized populations. Not sure how yet.
-
Also notice when I say ‶marginalized populations″ I mean that as shorthand as ‶unjustly marginalized populations″…

-
Heh, do you mean you aren't worried about alienating justly marginalized populations such as neo-Nazis and Trump voters?
-
I haven't internally delineated my personal boundaries for just. It may be fairly narrow for me like ‶is likely to be physically violent″.
-
I think most people are likely to be physically violent under the right circumstances; US forces report something like 95% firing rate
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not only that there's traditional Freemasonry, where you also have to be a man to do it.
-
I assert the reason for /men's/ boxing is 99% genetic, the reason traditional Freemasonry is male is 100% cultural.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.