I meant it had no data from human games. I’m not worried about whether we should call such things “ai” because the fact is they are going to have a huge impact on economies, militaries, and human life. That’s it
-
-
Replying to @woke8yearold @bronzeagemantis
Yes it did. It had the board size and the amount of pieces available. How is that 'no data from human games'?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @WesternSuicide @bronzeagemantis
Are you actually too dumb to understand that the researchers mean games played out by humans using pieces versus the rules of the game
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @woke8yearold @WesternSuicide
Myshkin right in the sense that teaching computard to play this, or a video game has no applications outside of it
3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @bronzeagemantis @WesternSuicide
No institution that actually has skin in the game and advanced knowledge agrees. Business, militaries around the world, scientists...but yeah you’re totally right there are no applications. Let’s check back in ten years
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Naive ai skepticism is one of the memes that I have essentially no sympathy for because it is completely incorrect
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @woke8yearold @WesternSuicide
yes they're also pouring money into nanotech and other frauds...that govt bureaucracies and academics are pouring MONEY into bullshit doesn't mean it's real science. Lots of people want money and make shit up. At the moment there aren't any applications
1 reply 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @bronzeagemantis @WesternSuicide
You’re right every important institution is cucked and only internet posters that lack real experience in technology can see the truth
5 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
F*ceb**k can recognize a billion faces and we're within striking distance of making convincing video of anyone doing anything but, sure, no applications
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I'm honestly not sure how anyone can believe it. It's so obviously wrong that I have a hard time taking it seriously.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Some of the more breathless xrisk singulatarian bloviating has poisoned the well a bit. AI is less like us than an insect in many ways, I suspect always will be, that doesn't make it fake or less important
-
-
On a truly long time horizon (think within 100 years) we could see truly powerful forms of AI emerge, but it's not the sort of thing anyone should try to make specific predictions about. It's worth thinking about but obviously less important than more immediate tech problems.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.