djariiVerified account

The Russian DLC for BF1 featured a female sniper on its cover. No one cared cuz the russians actually did use ALOT of female snipers in WW1. They were historically accurate. This proves that people arent mad for sexist reasons, we’re mad cuz of historical accuracy

When did battlefield claim to be 100% historically accurate?

The fact that out of all the things in life that could make someone mad, that this is one, is quite frankly hilarious.

Because you clearly care more about political correctness than you do about historical accuracy. Battlefield has always focused on historical accuracy until now

There were women who fought in WW2- so why is it wrong that they decided to make one of those (regardless of how very few) the main character? They fought in it, it's not inaccurate.. There just weren't many.

There werent many blacks either, so why isnt she black, huh? Or transgender? Or gay? See how little sense your logic makes?

Maybe she is gay.. Who knows..

You’re missing the point. My point is you cant pander to tiny minorities. Women were a tiny minority in the war. If your argument is about the work they did for he war effort, men still did far more, so your argument doesnt make sense