Wait.. Are people legit upset there's a woman on the cover of a Battlefield game?pic.twitter.com/U1hdY28iSg
-
Show this thread
-
It’s not about the fact that she’s a woman, its about the historical accuracy. There were VERY VERY few women in combat in WW2
5 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @AlexMason249
Oooooooh so this is an issue of historical accuracy.. I see.
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
It is tho. Mock me all you want but i’m being serious. Why even do a WW2 game if you’re not going to be historically accurate? Also, why do you want women in war games so badly? Whats with this obsession with wanting to see women shot and killed in war?!
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @AlexMason249
First of all, I consider men and women equal. Seeing a man or a woman shot and killed in war is awful all the same. Secondly, I couldn't care less if there's a woman in it, just that people are so disgusted by it. Truly a testament to the attitudes of the internet.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
As do i, but again, WW2 was fought by almost entirely men. There was no “equal representation” in WW2. History is not politically correct. If you’re not gonna stay true to what WW2 actually was, why do it at all? But i disagree, its much worse seeing women getting killed in war
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlexMason249
People make games or movies inspired by real life events all the time. Doesn't mean they need to be a 1:1 accurate depiction. This is a video game created for entertainment. It's not a historic documentary.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Thats true, and its a fair point, but that’s not an excuse to blatantly ignore historical facts
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What part is blatantly disregarding historical facts? We established that there were women who fought in the war, and that battlefield honored them by depicting them on a cover.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.