Wait.. Are people legit upset there's a woman on the cover of a Battlefield game?pic.twitter.com/U1hdY28iSg
Show this thread
-
It is tho. Mock me all you want but i’m being serious. Why even do a WW2 game if you’re not going to be historically accurate? Also, why do you want women in war games so badly? Whats with this obsession with wanting to see women shot and killed in war?!
First of all, I consider men and women equal. Seeing a man or a woman shot and killed in war is awful all the same. Secondly, I couldn't care less if there's a woman in it, just that people are so disgusted by it. Truly a testament to the attitudes of the internet.
-
-
Women fought in the war, yes, less on front lines, but they still fought. Sad people can't celebrate or honour them in even a small way as a game cover without people getting upset by it.
-
Women fought in far fewer numbers and almost mever on the front lines. Thats not sexist, thats just how WW2 was
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
As do i, but again, WW2 was fought by almost entirely men. There was no “equal representation” in WW2. History is not politically correct. If you’re not gonna stay true to what WW2 actually was, why do it at all? But i disagree, its much worse seeing women getting killed in war
-
People make games or movies inspired by real life events all the time. Doesn't mean they need to be a 1:1 accurate depiction. This is a video game created for entertainment. It's not a historic documentary.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Men and women are equal in terms of life, but not in terms of physical strength. You're saying you want a game where their shouldn't be any relative realism to real life such as the battlefield. I understand that point, but then how would games have such immersion.
-
Well you obviously haven't met
@oliviadgrace then... - 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.