Wait.. Are people legit upset there's a woman on the cover of a Battlefield game?pic.twitter.com/U1hdY28iSg
Show this thread
-
It’s not about the fact that she’s a woman, its about the historical accuracy. There were VERY VERY few women in combat in WW2
-
-
It is tho. Mock me all you want but i’m being serious. Why even do a WW2 game if you’re not going to be historically accurate? Also, why do you want women in war games so badly? Whats with this obsession with wanting to see women shot and killed in war?!
-
First of all, I consider men and women equal. Seeing a man or a woman shot and killed in war is awful all the same. Secondly, I couldn't care less if there's a woman in it, just that people are so disgusted by it. Truly a testament to the attitudes of the internet.
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Historical accuracy in a video game. If you wish to study go and read a book my the many great historians. Go read about Nancy Wake etc. Did you feel the same outrage about Leonardo Da Vinci meeting an Assassin?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think that's the main point, yes. Nobody cared about women in future-orientated Call of Duty's, but it's just a weird choice to come up with the world wars and try to put women in there. If there were no women in a World War 3 Shooter, that would be inaccurate as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.