I’m not against daycare for young kids—families are all different and complicated! So are childcare arrangements! But I don’t want to stack the deck against parents who stay home and shift culture towards stay-at-home parenting being weird and counterculture.
-
-
Show this thread
-
To be clear, I’m not trying to make an argument about optimizing measurable kid outcomes per dollar spent. If you don’t share my deep skepticism of government-run programs and intuitive greater (though far from perfect) trust in families,
.https://twitter.com/seracena/status/1197630881537646592 …Show this thread -
I agree that trusting intuition at the expense of looking at numbers is silly. My current-day intuitions seems informed by all the data I’ve seen over the years, which is a lot! I have tried to look!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
same but for schools
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's the evidence base on voucher/cash vs state run for outcomes/cost-efficiency? Have there been trials? What outcomes are we targeting? It shouldn't be considered self evident until put to trial.
-
I don’t know of evidence about at US f younger than kindergarten. When I dived into the evidence for regular school vouchers a while back my impression was that vouchers get the same crappy results for a little cheaper, and families prefer them. Not particularly my crux though?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But surely both universal daycare and cash transfers are strictly better than current option?
-
Currently you either spend a big chunk of your salary on daycare or give up salary and stay at home. That's a direct incentive to stay at home, and it does increase number of stay at home parents, but it is a regressive measure with overwhelmingly negative effects.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.