The last two I can understand: there is intentional "fail closed" logic in seccomp in those cases. Losing TIF_SECCOMP, though, I'd expect would instantly bypass seccomp. What actually goes wrong if only that is changed? (Also, I assume you unset NNP too?)
-
-
-
If TIF_SECCOMP is set, it reaches the secure_computing() function which hits this https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/5ad18b2e60b75c7297a998dea702451d33a052ed/kernel/seccomp.c#L939 … So the mode needs to be non zero if that flag is set. It doesn't look like NNP was set!
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.