And I should be clear: Twitter's worth criticizing simply because it *is* important, and has far better values than most big tech companies.
-
-
@dickc agreed you get the issue, which is why the response was surprising/disappointing. Shortcoming of tweet ambiguity. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@dickc more relevant is that the issue is worth discussing on its own, and with women, separate from any misgivings about the criticism. -
@anildash of course! (But hyperbole on the right side of the fence is WORSE than hyperbole on the wrong/other side!) -
@dickc I'm not sure I concur? But at any rate, would love to hear more about the work of inclusion, because I (we all) could learn from it. -
@anildash Well, that's exactly it. The whole thing has to be about more than checking a box & saying "we did it!" & you DO concur. SO MUCH! -
.
@dickc No Dick, it isn't about checking a box and you didn't do enough. You have a social responsiblity. You have to lead--not make excuses -
@wadhwa you're not seeing my point. you give people an easy out by just checking a box. The issues are much bigger than checking any 1 box. -
.
@dickc Dick, you are one of the most visible companies in tech. If you won't take the lead and fix the imbalance, who will? -
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.