It's not like we didn't run sessions here locally in Austin. I didn't say "majority;" I'd say the number of experiences of people I've witnessed personally and heard of secondary is in the "many" range.
-
I think I got more out of it than that. For education, the argument is the pedagogical simplicity of plain GHC -- not Stack, not even Cabal. For production, the argument is new-build Cabal, and for many non-Stackers also Nix to nail FFI with some principled architecture.
You also get to see some (not all) of the deflective tactics that are deployed when pseudo-debate occurs. Especially around stack. I find it interesting, even if dishonest and non-progressive.
-
-
To be fair, many people are not saying "works on my machine" (though many are). They are asking, "please give us more details so we can fix/improve Stack." At best, the response seems to be, "I'm not actually interested in that, because Stack is not needed, hence a bad idea."
-
You are always too generous :) No, it was recurrent deflection, not argument, or aspirations for improvement.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.