Tony Morris

You understand that this is consistent, right?

I understand that it is not.

Then all nomenclature, even with clarification, must be derived from mathematics?

No, but this clearly is. You've just performed the fallacy of excluded middle.

No, it clearly isn't, as clarified, which is a word derived from the word clear, clearly.

The only thing you've clarified is that you use a word in a way incompatible with how everyone else uses it. As much as idioglossia is funny, it's also fairly stupid, so i corrected you. You cling to it, but no amount of argument is going to change that you got the meaning wrong.

You're wrong on the way that "everyone uses it." I don't know what idioglossia is. I am not clinging to anything. I asked a question. You have failed to answer it. Amusingly, this very issue has come up before, many years ago. There are better arguments for your attempt FWIW.

Look up idioglossia then. Are you trying to reinforce innumeracy with illiteracy?