Should PureScript have a wikipedia page? It keeps getting deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PureScript … Pls RT, maybe the numbers on this poll will be useful next time there's an attempt to resurrect the page.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @pchiusano
Are you people so dense? What is there not to understand about THIRD PARTY SOURCES? I’ve been telling you for months now, why are you still blaming it on Wikipedia?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profpatsch @pchiusano
http://www.gwern.net/In-Defense-Of-Inclusionism … literally the only sane reasons to outright delete content on wikipedia are factual inaccuracy and vandalism.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
If that were actually executed, it would result in a lot of deletion. It is incredibly unlikely to occur. Wikipedia, by definition, and in practice, does not correlate to factual accuracy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That’s just stupid badmouthing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No your face is!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
No srsly. Wikipedia is jam packed full of inaccuracies, particularly in areas of expertise. Do with this matter of fact whatever it is that you may choose.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.