Should PureScript have a wikipedia page? It keeps getting deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PureScript … Pls RT, maybe the numbers on this poll will be useful next time there's an attempt to resurrect the page.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @pchiusano
I wouldn't hold my breath, they seem determined to not allow a Purescript entry.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lvicentesanchez @pchiusano
That’s not how Wikipedia works. They have rules to decide what’s notable. Read those rules, then find or create notable sources.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Blaisorblade @lvicentesanchez
Even if "the rules" gave an unambiguous answer in this case (they don't), they are at best a heuristic. Why would anyone follow rules that don't accomplish their supposed goals?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Even the Wikipedia agrees with me: "Ignore all rules" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_rules_are_principles#Ignore_all_rules …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Ignoring all the rules *and admitting it* is very much against the spirit of the programming industry in general.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.