I disagree with SLURP because a technical solution to a social problem only enshrines social division instead of fixing it. The only sustainable solution for the Haskell community is for the Hackage and Stackage maintainers to swallow their pride and become friends.https://twitter.com/tweagio/status/955747197370454017 …
-
-
Replying to @GabrielG439
That would be better, but it's not going to happen (we tried, a lot). So what then?
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
-
Replying to @GabrielG439
There were numerous discussions over the past months to try to resolve disputes
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @simonmar
What I'm trying to discern is if these discussions were trying to resolve technical disagreements or if they were focused on resolving personal animosity
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GabrielG439 @simonmar
May I suggest that asking a third party about a sensitive topic on a public forum is not the most effective way of either gleaning information or helping bridge the gap?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Public discussion must be the default to have an open community. If one party has sensitive information, they can initiate a private conversation themselves, but I don't see why
@GabrielG439 should.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @int_index @snoyberg and
The initial SLURP discussion was all behind the scenes, and you can see how it turned out.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
My blog post explicitly calls out for more open discussions. Discussing technical issues in public: awesome. Asking for details of a series of private discussions about personal issues: not the same.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
I agree, but how and why did this become personal in the first place?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.