-
-
-
Replying to @pedrofurla
If Task stops existing, this is a significant improvement. There are potentially appropriate data structures after that.
@puffnfresh did it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
With IO WE can represent async result and manipulate explicitly async data ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
yeah
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ok. I'll check the doc soon. Thx.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
probably not easy to see how using the doc. But Task doesn't have that either I guess
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
type AnyOlThing[A] = IO[A]
1:26 AM - 8 Jun 2017
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
-
-
Replying to @dibblego @puffnfresh and
Can someone explain the differences between them and why Task should be avoided?
@monix is also boasts using Tasks1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Interested too
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.