Just a reminder, one of the original #scalaz codes of conduct was; criticism of your code is not a criticism of your person.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
But that has to depend on who is criticizing and whom is being criticized?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joxzaren
But it doesn't, because we know who was being criticised. Zero people were.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @joxzaren
It's a matter of fact, that wrong people are free to disagree with, as long as they do so at their own expense.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
The scalaz "controversy" made me re-evaluate my view on CoC. "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never break me."
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joxzaren
I'll show you what happens when a CoC is written and managed by competent people if you like.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @joxzaren
I am against idiocy, of which almost every written CoC is a manifestation. I fly aeroplanes to get away from idiots. Aviation has a CoC.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I put a child abuser in jail two weeks ago. That's because the CoC was written by not-total-fucking-idiots. Such a low bar.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.